• Web Site Pages

  • Tags

  • Article Categories

  • Article Archives

  • Random Quote

    It is fear that first brought gods into the world. — Petronius Arbiter, Satyricon

  • Administration

  • Current Moon Phase


    New Moon
    New Moon

Researchers Prove Bible Grossly Mistranslated

A research group in Canada, has proven that the Old Testament has been massively mistranslated.

This follows three years of research, which have uncovered the actual system for translating ancient Hebrew.

The group discovered that each letter is not a letter at all, but a full word, and what was believed to be a word, is actually a sentence like description, which supplies the definition of the word.  With this discovery, each word can now be properly defined and the results are astounding.

This means a word can no longer be disputed and swayed by doctrinal pressures

If accurate, the findings will rewrite everything we presently believe about the scriptual beginnings of the Earth.

Research Head Christopher Tyreman states that what they have found, proves without a doubt, that the Bible has been grossly mistranslated and that their findings expose this fact with glaring simplicity.  He further stated that he finds it interesting that a group of lay researchers were able to see and assemble what they call “Self Defining Hebrew or the SDH System” while experts seemed unaware of its existence.

The team also wished people to understand that this is not a bible code, but the system the original language was built on.

Its construct shows it to be a manufactured system of massive complexity, using only twenty two words, which when mixed, can supply a complete language.

Mr. Tyreman also added that the form of this language shows it could not have evolved from surrounding cultures as it is incapable of importing  words from outside language.  This alone points to an origination outside of the scope of the presently held theories of language development.  These findings could have a major impact on how Science and religion look at our beginnings.

The research team has posted all of its work online @ www.thechronicleproject.org

Via: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-611844


Related Articles

Comment Pages

There are 1 Comments to "Researchers Prove Bible Grossly Mistranslated"

  • Smart says:

    Sent email, will post their response the moment it arrives:

    Hello, I am sending in this email concerning at least three matters, I shall list them in questions below, thank you for reading and responding to this inquiry.

    1. As part of the early stages of the translation project, you write that Bereshit (Genesis) 1:1 should be rendered “the Supreme Ones”. My concern with this translation is that there is no “the” modifying Elohim (the word you are attempting to render “Supreme Ones”, while it is true the -im suffix indicates plural in nearly all circumstances, the context of the verse implies a singular word for deity should be used. Thus all translations since the first English translation have rendered it ‘God’. There is a dispute over the proper translation of [the word] Bereshit, whether the conventional “In the Beginning God created…” or the NRSV “When God created…” is to be preferred in English translation is not fully agreed upon. Thus I make no complaint on that matter. However, your translation “Supreme Ones” seems completely impossible to someone literate in Hebrew. This is never what Elohim has been taken to mean and no Jewish or Christian commentary ever took it as such. This is most definitely why you claim to be the “first correct” in translation. Please defend your reading of the passage against the majority 99.9%) rendering. [not an appeal to majority fallacy, mind you, just merely pointing out the apparent boldness and audacity]

    2. Your project implies that the Ancient Hebrew language was unbelievably pithy in content, containing not even two dozen words. Could you please explain this further, and how do you account for the over 8000+ words in the Hebrew Bible according to common convention? Also why has no professional philologist, linguist or Hebraica expert ever proposed this? Are they all simply Lucys in comparison to your team?
    3. What is the qualifications of your team, where did you obtain your degrees from, what is the median age, what inspired this, what is your collective religious background if any and lastly, have any credible scholars looked into your findings? [If so, what are their thoughts, names and writings]

    Thank you for reading this email and I look forward to your response.

Write a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Join us in the Paltalk Room

    - Windows Paltalk Client
    - Mac / Web Paltalk Express
    - iPhone, Android, Blackberry

    We're in the "Paltalk /
    Religion & Spirituality / Christianity / Debate Faith with AAL" room.


  • Atheist At Large Store

  • Deity of the Day

    DEITY OF THE DAY
    Daily Gods powered by
    www.godchecker.com
  • Recent Articles

  • NASA Image of the Day

    A Supernova Cocoon Breakthrough

     
    Observations with NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory have provided the first X-ray evidence of a supernova shock wave breaking through a cocoon of gas surrounding the star that exploded. This discovery may help astronomers understand why some supernovas are much more powerful than others. On Nov. 3, 2010, a supernova was discovered in the galaxy UGC 5189A, located about 160 million light years away. Using data from the All Sky Automated Survey telescope in Hawaii taken earlier, astronomers determined this supernova exploded in early October 2010 (in Earth's time-frame). This composite image of UGC 5189A shows X-ray data from Chandra in purple and optical data from Hubble Space Telescope in red, green and blue. SN 2010jl is the very bright X-ray source near the top of the galaxy. A team of researchers used Chandra to observe this supernova in December 2010 and again in October 2011. The supernova was one of the most luminous that has ever been detected in X-rays. The results of these observations were published in a paper that appeared in the May 1, 2012 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters. Credits: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Royal Military College of Canada/P.Chandra et al); Optical: NASA/STScI
    Read More
  • Spam

    159
    Spam comments blocked