Oklahoma Anti-Sharia Amendment Violates U.S. Constitution, Groups Tell Appeals Court
An Oklahoma constitutional amendment that purports to ban Islamic law in the state singles out Muslims for discrimination and should not be enforced, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and other groups have told a federal appeals court.
The so-called “Save Our State Amendment” barring enforcement of sharia passed with 70 percent of the vote in November, but Americans United and the other organizations assert that the provision is unconstitutional.
“The amendment singles out one faith tradition for government hostility,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director. “That violates our fundamental constitutional requirement that government remain neutral on religion.
“Oklahoma doesn’t need a special amendment to protect it from government-imposed Islamic law,” he continued. “The First Amendment already does that.
“I think we all know that sharia has no chance of taking over Oklahoma,” Lynn concluded. “This entire incident has been a sad example of politically motivated religious intolerance.”
A lawsuit against the amendment was filed by Muneer Awad, executive director of the Oklahoma Council for American-Islamic Relations. In November, U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange issued a preliminary injunction in Awad v. Ziriax, to stop the Oklahoma State Election Board from certifying the election results.
The case is now on appeal to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. In a friend-of-the-court brief, Americans United and other organizations urge the appeals court to void the amendment.
The brief asserts that the amendment was passed after a wave of anti-Islamic sentiment that was often led by state legislators. The amendment, the groups argue, sends a clear message of governmental disapproval of Islam.
“[A] provision like the Save Our State Amendment communicates to Muslims that they – and they alone – are likely to receive inferior treatment on account of their religion,” asserts the brief.
The brief was drafted by the American Jewish Committee and attorneys Craig C. Martin and Joshua M. Segal of the firm of Jenner & Block LLP, with input from attorneys at Americans United and other organizations.
Other groups joining the brief are the Anti-Defamation League, the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, the Center for Islamic Pluralism, the Interfaith Alliance and the Union for Reform Judaism.
Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.
Related Articles
- Feds Force Oklahoma Bank To Remove Crosses, Bible Verse, UPDATED – KOCO Oklahoma City
- Prayer constitutional amendment will appear on Missouri ballot
- Atheists Win! Appeals Court Refuses to Hear Utah Crosses Case
- Oklahoma passes law to restrict Westboro Baptist protests
- State Senator Wants Creationism in Oklahoma Public Schools
There are 1 Comments to "Oklahoma Anti-Sharia Amendment Violates U.S. Constitution, Groups Tell Appeals Court"
Without reading the amendment and only taking this for what is being said here, then there is nothing wrong with banning sharia. It is not unconstitutional since sharia is law.
It is not religious outside of what a group of religious people use it for their doctrine of extreme indoctrinational process’s.
We already have a ban on sharia as well as many other laws from other countries and religions, this is no different.
Sharia calls for whipping and death penalties for the slightest of crimes. With that said it also calls for a faster resolution to cases brought into its jurisdiction. When sharia is monitored and regulated to what it can rule on as it has been in England, the case load upon the normal court system starts to go down. The virdicts are fast and not so furious due to the limitations put on what the sharia can address.
Since the system is faster hundreds of non muslims flock to the court for resolutions to property matters, simple legal tasks etc.
Here’s where the real rub comes in, the sharia court system would be getting the money from fines not the local or state governments, and the non muslim people would get a false warm and fuzzy feeling about sharia, not knowing the etreme nature of it.
This is part of the islamification that islamics want to install in governments around the world, and its a passive agressive act of war. They are using “our” sensibilities” against us, our moderate nature not to mention our overall ignorance.