50-Year-Old Experiments Give New Clues on Origin of Life

Jeffrey Bada was comparing notes with his colleague Antonio Lazcano a couple of years ago, when something brought him up short. The two chemists, one from the U.S. and one from Mexico, had met in Texas to give a series of talks on prebiotic chemistry — the substances that gave rise to life on earth — when Lazcano pulled up a slide showing a vial with gunky residue spilling out.

"Where did this come from?" Bada asked. "Stanley gave it to me," replied Lazcano. "He saved it from his original experiments." Recalls Bada: "It just blew me away."

With good reason. Stanley was Stanley Miller, whose experiments with Harold Urey in the 1950s were the first serious attempt to figure out how life on earth began. By passing sparks through a brew of methane, ammonia, water vapor and hydrogen — a mixture thought at the time to be similar to earth’s primordial atmosphere — Miller and his collaborator, Urey, both chemists at the University of Chicago, created amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. It later turned out that their reconstructed atmosphere was probably wrong, and the experiment had never been repeated with a more accurate mixture. Or so everyone thought.

(See the top 10 scientific discoveries of 2010.)

But everyone was wrong, as a serendipitous turn of events would soon show. Lazcano was not the only one to have received some scientific memorabilia from the long-ago experiments. After Miller left Chicago, he worked alongside Bada at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, in San Diego. When Miller died in 2007, Bada inherited boxes full of his lab paraphernalia. He’d never poked around in them much — but after the encounter with Lazcano, says Bada: "I realized I must have this sample in a box, and I’ve got to find that box."

It took all of 15 minutes. "It was just a stunning experience," Bada says. "All these little boxes full of equipment and vials from all Stanley’s original experiments. It was an unbelievable collection of organic compounds and amino acids." And most of the work, which took place in the years following Miller’s landmark experiment with Urey, had never been described in the scientific literature.

That’s starting to change, though. In 2008, Bada, along with Lazcano, of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, and several others reran some of Miller’s experiments using his original apparatus, and published the results in the journal Science. Now a second paper has come out in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which amplifies on that result. What makes both studies so potentially important is that they’re based on a more realistic picture of conditions on early earth.

(See pictures of earth from space.)

In particular, they suggest to Bada that life might have arisen, not in the "warm little pool" that Darwin himself once guessed, but in the violent environs of volcanic eruptions. "We know that the early earth had few continents, but it had a lot of volcanoes, and they were hotter and more powerful than we’re used to. They would have been belching hydrogen sulfide and other gases."

Volcanic plumes would also have triggered powerful discharges of lightning from the skies, as they do today. And that, says Bada, is essentially what Miller’s unpublished experiments showed. One piece of apparatus that survives in Bada’s collection is configured in a way that suggests Miller was working with hydrogen sulfide and hot steam. And sure enough, when the scientists analyzed Miller’s original samples that came from that particular setup, they found a wide assortment of amino acids, including some that had never been made before. "Stanley couldn’t have detected them with the crude analysis available to him at the time," says Bada.

Intriguingly, this relatively new take on prelife chemistry may fit in nicely with evidence from outer space as well. Carbon-rich meteorites have long been known to have amino acids inside them (this is a far cry, by the way, from recent claims about meteorites containing bacteria, which nobody takes seriously). We know, says Bada, that before the planets formed, the cloud of gas and dust surrounding the newborn sun was full of these same gases and also full of electricity — essentially, interplanetary lightning. "It was probably converting these simple gases into amino acids," says Bada.

So is this finally the grand unified theory of how life began? Not quite. Other scientists still think that first step happened at the mouths of so-called hydrothermal vents, at the bottom of the sea. And even if everyone finally agrees on where the amino acids originally came from, they’re a long way from actual life forms.

"The big action right now," says Bada, "is how go from these simple molecules to self-replicating molecules. It’s challenging science. But it’s just a matter of time," he believes, "before we figure out some candidate."

Read "Arsenic and Old Space: A Key to Life on Other Planets?"

via Origin of Life: 50-Year-Old Experiments Give New Clues – TIME.

Related Articles

• Grisly Scene Gives Clues to Neandertal Family Structure – ScienceNOW
• Space rock surprise: Amino acids in meteorite may have unexpected origin
• Research overturns oldest evidence of life on Earth – Physorg.com
• Eight-year-old children publish bee study in Royal Society journal
• Scientists decipher 3 billion-year-old genomic fossils – MIT